One belief, widely held by Americans and Canadians, that I don't believe in.
"I was here first. Therefore, I get extra rights and decision making powers"
@Elmkast Hehe indeed. That's the definition of nativism. NIMBYism is in fact the derivative phenomenon.
@Elmkast Isn't this the essence of a parent-child relationship?
@duane I was thinking more in terms of land/citizenship. But there is truth to that!
Ha, just thinking about where the structure/psychology of the claim might come from. Might bring insight into possible solutions.
@Elmkast Shouldn’t people with skin in the game have more authority?
@octesian What skin? What game?
If you mean financial assets, then hell no. If you mean a vested emotional connection, not sure how you'd even qualify that so still no
The deal is they have to invest 1 million, or half a million and create a certain amount of jobs.
What they do is set up companies that trade the same few million euro houses between a few chinese millionares.
@Elmkast not more financial assets in general but if you own something, or a portion of something your say should mean more than someone’s who isn’t an owner on matters of that thing. It’s a basic part of property rights.
@octesian Sounds fair enough - but what happens when people buy a home in a neighborhood with the expectation of that neighborhood staying a certain way and the schools in that neighborhood staying a certain way? Do they have a right to control what goes on outside their property line?
(they argue yes, because the bulk of their property value has nothing to do with what's on the lot)
@octesian Personally I think purchasing a home should be literally that - there is no extra "vote" included.
This ties back to my original toot: many people disagree with me and think those there "first" should get veto power
That doesn't even sound so bad, until you realize that people use that veto power to ruthlessly pursue self interest
@Elmkast if you buy a house you own both the house and a share in the neighborhood. I agree that people who got there first shouldn’t have a greater vote, but they should still get a vote on anything their tax dollars are paying for.
@Elmkast it gets blurry though. Locals should have more power than tourists for example since they’re motivated for more long term thinking. The issue is that the more money you have the more mobile you are, blurring the line between local and tourist. Some places may even be all tourist/partial-local occupied.
The exhortation at the root is “You only have one body! How much can you possibly want!”
@aRandomCat I would say that locals in many city have chosen to invite and indulge tourists because of the obvious economic benefits. To which someone might say, "well not the real locals" and then we are just back to my original point
Mastodon instance for attendees of Refactor Camp, and members of various online/offline groups that have grown out of it. Related local groups with varying levels of activity exist in the Bay Area, New York, Chicago, and Austin.
Kinda/sorta sponsored by the Ribbonfarm Blogamatic Universe.
If you already know a few people in this neck of the woods, try and pick a handle they'll recognize when you sign up. Please note that the registration confirmation email may end up in your spam folder, so check there. It should come from administrator Zach Faddis.