I found Richard P. Gabriel whilst researching the concept of "habitable code", which seems to fit my intuition about what makes for good code.
A codebase should be views as Living Structure not as a exercise in High Modernism.
This line from the intro in the book struck me as the way I've seen people use the GoF book incorrectly:"..the ideas of A Pattern Language cannot
be applied mechanically. Instead, these ideas—patterns—are hardly more than
glimpses of a much deeper level of structure, and is ultimately within this deeper
level of structure, that the origin of life occurs"
But as I understand her she argues that the real 10x lies in taking a broader perspective and thinking about the people and the "aliveness" of the code in an Alexander way.
Which then leads to a 10x not in the time to market but in some other metric, maybe 10x less entropy, or big hary messes in the long run.
Some examples are the functional map/reduce/filter/etc patterns. Turned 10+ lines of boilerplate code into one line.
Or look at how the patterns that Sinatra introduced about building web frameworks spread incredibly quickly to almost every other language.
Mastodon instance for attendees of Refactor Camp, and members of various online/offline groups that have grown out of it. Related local groups with varying levels of activity exist in the Bay Area, New York, Chicago, and Austin.
Kinda/sorta sponsored by the Ribbonfarm Blogamatic Universe.
If you already know a few people in this neck of the woods, try and pick a handle they'll recognize when you sign up. Please note that the registration confirmation email may end up in your spam folder, so check there. It should come from administrator Zach Faddis.