I think a lot of people have a wrong idea about is that they'll recognize when their country corrupts itself. That getting groceries will just somehow *feel* different for them.
What's hard to fathom is that there very well might be *no* immediate personal impact for them.
This is why attending to the marginal in society produces clarity, whereas distance inhibits judgement. Reliance on personal experience produces a myopia that's exacerbated to the extent it's distanced from this exposure.
There are two ways to handle loss: an awful way and a powerful way. The awful way is to turn into a loser: which is to accept the role scripted for you by the winning side. The powerful way to handle a loss is to not lose. This only seems like a paradox if you don’t understand what Henry Kissinger meant when he said, “the conventional army loses if it does not win, the guerrilla army wins if it does not lose.”
Everyone what's you're favorite Simpsons story that symbolizes the worlds current state of affairs?
Annddddddddd go
MS in HCI and Urban Informatics ~ Wall St. tech exile ~ founding member of argolabs.org ~ day jobbing at gaia.com ~ recently moved from NYC to Boulder, CO
More: bitly.com/vr00n-storymap
Anyone have insight into why the name "mastadon"? Doesn't seem like an obvious connection to shooting the breeze.
Also why 500 characters?